"In the din of the Internet's
noise, Sean Reid is one of a handful of voices worth listening to."
- Kent Phelan, USA
"The best and
most detailed account (of the Leica M8) I've yet read from a
photographer's point of view is on the Reid Reviews site."
- Peter Marshall
Photography Guide, About.com
"Reviewing photographic
equipment isn't as easy as it looks. Not only does it take writing skill,
and a critical sensibility, but for the review to carry weight and have
value its author must have significant experience with similar and
previous equipment. Sean Reid has written equipment reviews for The
Luminous Landscape for the past two years, and unfailingly they have
been well-researched and comprehensive. Sean writes with both style and
insight, and bases his opinions on his years as a photographer, and not
simply from the perspective of a technologist, as is too frequently found
on the Net. His site is free of advertising, and well worth your
support. I was particularly taken by his article "On Small Sensor
Cameras". It is a unique perspective on how different digital
formats are redrawing the face of photography."
- Michael Reichmann,
Publisher
The Luminous Landscape
Welcome to ReidReviews.com,
an on-line magazine of reviews and essays by photographer and writer Sean
Reid. Each year, there will be at least twelve new articles
about the tools and practice of photography added to this site.
Every writer naturally brings his or her
own experience and perspective to the articles he or she
writes. My writing is heavily influenced by my experience
working as a documentary photographer for the past twenty
years. I'm primarily interested in cameras and lenses as tools
for drawing, as I believe that photography really is a branch of
drawing. I'm guided by the photographer Andre Kertesz's
observation, "I see the thing, I feel the thing, I make the thing".
So when I review a camera or a lens, I look primarily at how it presents
the world to the photographer (via the finder), how it works as a
tool in the hands, and how it draws the kind of picture we call a
photograph.
|
|
|
There are at least two kinds of review
content on this web site. There are reviews of cameras and lenses
that are receiving wide attention from many photographers and reviewers as
well as reviews of equipment that is of great interest to
more specialized groups of photographers. For example, I have
written quite a bit about the Epson R-D1 and lenses for digital
rangefinder photography and rangefinder equipment will continue to be an
important focus in my writing. Naturally, this will include further
articles about the Leica M8 and various lenses on that camera. I'm also an architectural and
documentary wedding photographer and so will be looking at the performance
of cameras and lenses in those contexts. I obviously can't write
about every piece of photographic equipment and so my focus is really on
tools that, I think, deserve some attention from serious photographers,
professional or amateur. Sometimes they are fairly new to the
market, other times they might be quite old and found only as used
equipment. In either case, if I decide to write about a lens
or camera, it's because I believe it's worth reading about. I
was a film photographer for two decades (and a B&W exhibition
printer for a few years) but I now work entirely with digital
capture. As such, most of my camera reviews will be of digital
models. That said, I do also review film cameras from time to time. The
individual reviews obviously discuss specific cameras and/or lenses but
all of the reviews also look at more general aspects of photography that can be
relevant no matter what camera and/or lens a photographer uses.
Portfolios of my work can be found on my photography
web site.
|
"Quite simply, I
think your sections on 'drawing' and and on 'sunny day lenses' are the
best writing about photographic lenses that I have read - whether in
magazines, journals, books or the various sources online. Few professional
writers about photography ever attempt such a full consideration of the
range of lens performance characteristics and the different ways in which
they are photographically significant. Some discussions in photographic
communities online circle around the subject, but don't achieve the focus,
rigour and articulacy that you have managed here. Your
article is what all writing about photographic lenses ought to be like,
yet it's astonishing that next to none of it is. Interesting though Irwin
Puts Leica lens book is, it would have been so much more interesting, and
so much more appropriate to its subject matter, if it had been written as
you have written here...I found the article incredibly useful and
interesting. A great help in clarifying and firming up what I have
experienced and half-understood about how different lenses work."
- Simon Pulman-Jones, England
"We all owe you a
vote of thanks for such a massive and thorough piece of work. What a
concept-- a "lens test" that is really about the pictorial
effect of how lenses draw their images. Lines per millimeter and MTF
graphs have their place, but your article really gets to the heart of the
matter in the way that photographers can relate to instantly."
- Peter
Klein, USA
"This is a really
excellent in depth review. I particularly like how you guide the reader
not to look for winners, but to use it as a reference for their own needs.
I think it may turn out to be a reference classic for working
photographers seeking how to judge lenses in real world use.. I for one
will be returning to it."
- Jim Watts,
USA
"I read your
substantial paper with great interest. I am an amateur enthusiast in
photography and optics. Your
concept first surprised me, because I have had an impression that few
photographers in North America and possibly in Europe like to discuss lens
characters as expression tools. Among Japanese photographers, amateurs and
professionals alike, there is a long tradition of interest or even
addiction in appreciating various image characters of optics. For
instance, Shoji Ohtake, one of the most influential photographers in Japan
writes a regular column titled Lens Physiognomy for a major camera
journal. He says that for each of his representation he selects the right
lens from his huge collection. I
was impressed by your pragmatic and well-organised approach in reviewing
the lenses. Your observation is keen and relevant to essential aspects of
photographic imagery. Your rhetoric is straight, logical, and free from
jargon. These are rarely met in review papers on similar tests, which tend
to be too technical or too subjective. I
should also tell you that I myself have evaluated lenses mostly in B&W
for the same reason as in your reviews. Few people have understood me.
All in all, it is a
marvelous paper. My applause."
- Mikiro
Mori, Japan
"...a very informative, even enlightening, work. It not only provides visual
evidence of comparative lenses' performance, it also gets right to the
most important factor of lens evaluation - how the image looks to the
photographer. Long ago I stopped reading test charts of lenses since none
of my clients ever published any. It is always the look of the finished
image that counts."
- Richard Weisgrau, USA
"I hope your tests
become a benchmark for other reviewers to pay more attention to the real
needs of photographers..."
- Phil Fogle,
USA
"I think that your
approach is what photographers have been asking for. Your article was
spectacularly successful. I didn't think a review could be any better than
yours on wide angles for the R-D1, but you topped it with this one. Thank
you for all the hard work that went into it!"
- Bill
Marshall, USA

ReidReviews.com accepts
no advertising. A subscription is currently $32.95 per
year. To get an idea of whether or not my writing will be
useful to you, I'd recommend reading some of my existing reviews on Luminous-Landscape which are linked in the pictures
below or my review of the Canon 5D which was published on Imaging
Resource. Together, they can provide
you with a good sense of how I approach reviewing
photographic tools.
Wondering what other photographers have thought of Reid
Reviews? Take a look at some reviews of the site at About.com,
Auspicious
Dragon, Shards
of Photography, Rangefinder
Forum, Imaging
Resource and Photographica.

|
Example Camera and Lens Reviews To
Date |
|
- Canon 5D
- Canon 1DsMkII
- Canon 14/2.8L, 16-35/2.8L, 35/1.4L, 100/2.8
Macro (DMR Review)
- Canon 14/2.8 L (II)
- Canon 24/3.5 TS-E L Shift Lens
- Cosina Voigtlander Bessa R2A
- Epson R-D1 Long-Term Report
- Leica D-Lux 2
- Leica D-Lux 3
- Leica Digilux 3
- Leica M7
- Leica M8, Part One
- Leica M8, Part Two
- Leica M8, Part Three
- Leica M8, Part Four
- Leica M8 Updates
- Leica 35/2.5 Summarit
- 21 mm RF Lenses on Leica M8
- 24/25 mm RF Lenses on Leica M8
- 28 mm RF Lenses on Leica M8
- 35 mm RF Lenses on Leica M8
- 50 mm RF Lenses on Leica M8
- 75 mm RF Lenses on Leica M8
- 90 mm RF Lenses on Leica M8
- Leica R9/DMR
- Leica R 15/2.8, 19/2.8,
35/1.4, 28-90 and 100/2.8 macro (DMR Review)
- Leica M 24/2.8 Elmarit on Epson R-D1
- Leica M 50/2.0 Summicron on Epson R-D1
- Leica M Tri-Elmar on Epson R-D1
- Nikon D200
- Nikon 50/1.4 AF
- Olympus 18/3.5 on Canon 5D
- Olympus 24/3.5 Zuiko
Shift
- Olympus 35/2.8 Zuiko Shift
- Pentax K10D
- Pentax 43/1.9
Limited
- Pentax 15/3.5 Takumar on Canon 1Ds MkII
- Ricoh GR Digital
- Ricoh GR Digital II
- Ricoh Caplio GX100
- Sigma 12 - 24/4.5~5.6 on Canon 1Ds MkII
- Sony R1
- Voigtlander 21/4.0 P
- Voigtlander 25/4.0 P
- Voigtlander 40/1.4 Nokton on Leica M8
- Voigtlander 50/1.5 Nokton on Epson R-D1
- Zeiss Ikon
- Zeiss Jena Flektogon 20/2.8 on Canon 1Ds MkII and 5D
- Zeiss ZM 25/2.8 Biogon on Epson R-D1
- Zeiss ZM 50/2.0 Planar T on Epson R-D1
- Zeiss ZF 50/1.4 T Planar on Nikon D200
- Zeiss ZK 50/1.4 T Planar on Pentax K10D
- Zeiss ZK 35/2.0 Distagon T on Pentax K10D
|
- On Small
Sensor Cameras
- Correct
Exposure and Other Myths
- Photographing Daytona Bike Week
- Sticking With Film
- "Street Photography"
- Photographing Strangers
- Photographing People We Know
- Intro. to Rangefinder Cameras - Color or B&W - The Fisher Farm
|
Coming Later This Year
- Nikon D3
- Olympus E3
- Griangraf Na Paisti
|
|
Included on the site is my long-term review of the Epson R-D1, the
first DRF (Digital
Rangefinder) camera ever produced.
This extensive article looks at the camera's performance and reliability
over 15 months based on my own experience with three bodies and
the experiences of 48 photographers who responded in detail to a
custom-designed survey about the camera. This article should prove
to be of interest for anyone who is curious about DRFs, whether they are
R-D1 owners or not. For those who are considering buying the camera,
I think that the article is essential reading.


The one-year subscription rate
for the site is $32.95. Once your username and password
have been issued, the subscription amount is not refundable. The best way to sample my reviews (to decide if you'd want to be a
subscriber)
is to read my freely available Luminous-Landscape and Imaging
Resource reviews linked
above. Pay Pal customers can pay for their subscriptions using their
Pay Pal accounts and people who are not Pay Pal customers may make a
one-time credit card payment to Reid Reviews via PayPal. To make a
payment by check please follow the instructions listed on the
"subscribe" page which is linked below.
*Important*: Before
Subscribing, Please Note the Following: The subscriber section of ReidReviews.com
requires Macromedia's Flash player (version 7 or later), which you may
already have installed on your computer. If not, you can download it
for free here.
We recommend using the newest version of Flash that is available
for your computer and, for some browsers, using the newest
available version of Flash may be required. Since the subscriber section of the site is written in Flash, the content
is set at a fixed size and one needs a monitor resolution setting of at
least 1152 x 864 pixels to see the full site (at full screen setting)
without needing to scroll horizontally. To preview the size and
design of the site please click here.
Again, please remember that the site appears at a fixed size (in
pixels) on any monitor.* We
have optimized the size of the site's active window based on feedback
from many subscribers, most of whom are working with higher resolution
displays. For ease of reading, however, there are ways to zoom the Reid
Reviews Flash window to different sizes. See the tips at the end of
this section for suggestions. The active content of the site
appears in a Flash window that can be vertically scrolled using the
traditional on-screen graphics as well as the up/down arrow keys (on
Windows and Mac platforms). On Windows platforms, the scroll wheel on
a mouse can also scroll the content in the active window. For security reasons, the site content cannot be copied or
printed. None of the material published on Reid Reviews may be reproduced
in any form without permission from the author. This
site is best viewed on a calibrated monitor. My own calibrations are
based on a gamma of 2.2, for both my Windows and Macintosh computers,
and monitors calibrated to other gamma levels will display these
pictures in ways that aren't quite as intended. Please keep that in
mind, as you read the articles, if you are calibrated to a gamma other
than 2.2. My own editing monitor is an NEC 2490 Spectra View which I
calibrate regularly. Reid
Reviews is a high-bandwidth site full of high quality JPEGs that,
intentionally, are saved with minimal compression. In
addition to having a monitor resolution of at least 1152 x 864
pixels, I also strongly recommend that readers use a high speed
Internet connection for browsing the site. Its possible to browse
Reid reviews using a low speed connection but doing so will
require a great deal of patience. Since I myself am usually
restricted to a satellite Internet connection, I sympathize with the
plights of people working without true high-speed Internet access.
But preserving the thoroughness and technical picture quality of
the reviews requires that the included JPEGs be only lightly
compressed. When you
choose your user name and password *please* record
them in a safe place for
future reference. If you misplace your user name or password
please click on the "Log In" link and follow the
instructions there. Paypal
should automatically confirm your payment so that your
subscription begins immediately. Due to the mysteries of PayPal,
however, this sometimes does not happen for a small percentage of
new subscriptions. If you've made a subscription payment but
do not yet have access to the site, please allow up to 48 hours
(Monday - Friday) for me to manually confirm your subscription. Sometimes this
confirmation will happen in minutes if your payment is made during
business hours (9 - 5 EST) Monday through Friday. I am a
working photographer, however, so I'm not always at the computer
and your patience is appreciated.
That said, I do my best to get accounts activated as quickly
as possible.
Please
subscribe writing your name exactly as it appears on your PayPal
account (if you have one). Doing so can help to prevent
problems with a subscription starting automatically. If you have questions,
please e-mail me.
A
Side Note on Macintosh Computers and Text Readability I
work with both Macintosh and Windows computers. Macintosh
OSX, and later Macintosh operating systems, anti-alias fonts in
such a way that some (such as myself) find it more
difficult to read text. Without any special smoothing, the text on
the Reid Reviews site should look like this.
For a further discussion of this issue and some proposed
solutions, see this
article. In particular, Mac owners who find it hard to
read the smoothed fonts created by OS-X might want to try
downloading the free Tinkertool
and using it to disable font smoothing up to, say, 18 points. This
change can make most Mac text much more readable to those of us
for whom smoothing causes eyestrain, etc. That true not only for
this site but also for thousands of other sites on the web. The
articles on Reid Reviews are displayed using Arial as the
font. It's a Sans Serif font that some argue is less
readable in print, than a Serif font would be, but more
readable on screen. Opinions vary widely on this topic and several
of the studies cited to support the use of Serif fonts have
been heavily challenged and criticized. Readers who are interested
in this topic might find this
article, for example, to be of interest. It
is important that one have the Arial fonts installed, on his
or her computer, to view the site correctly. If those fonts aren't
installed, one may observe various layout problems in the articles
on the site.
Zooming Reid Reviews With Macintosh OSX Subscribers
who use Macintosh OS-X computers, and who are working at screen
resolutions greater than 1152 x 864 pixels, may want experiment with
using the "zoom" feature in OS-X which allows one to, in effect,
enlarge the Reid Reviews Flash window so that it fills as much of the
monitor's area as desired. The site content can then be scrolled using
the usual up/down page keys. For further information about this feature
see this article. I'd like to thank RR subscriber Aurin Raeder for this excellent tip.
Zooming Reid Reviews With Windows Subscribers
who use Windows and would like to change the size of the active Flash
window in Reid Reviews can do so using Internet Explorer 7 or Avant Browser. |
Other resources:
Luminous-Landscape
The
Leica User Forum and Classifieds
The
Online Photographer Open
Photography Forums Camera Work Forums Rawworkflow.com Photography
at About.com
Imaging-Resource "Still Photo" the new Reid Reviews discussion forum was launched May 1, 2008. If you decide to register for the new forum, and I certainly invite you to, please allow up to 24 hours to have your membership set up. Questions about registration, etc. should all be sent to Asher Kelman who owns Open Photography Forums. He can be contacted directly on the forum site.
|