Note: Current subscribers can click on the header above to log in, if desired. The link to renew a subscription 
or to check when it expires is near the bottom of this page.
The Reid Reviews article index can be found here.

The Reid Reviews article index can be found here.

What's New: 

Reid Reviews' normal business hours are 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST Monday through Friday (excluding holidays)
and any problems with subscriptions, responses to e-mail, etc. are normally handled during those business hours.
I am, however, sometimes away for medical appointments during those hours and appreciate your patience if you
need to wait for a response to your e-mail. 
If subscribing, please be sure that the full name you provide exactly
matches the name on your PayPal account.

Please Note: I will be travelling for work, with only periodic access to e-mail,  from July 28 - August 9.  If you need to
contact me during that time period, please allow extra time for my reply.

On July 17 I published an extensive review of five fast 35 mm lenses on the Leica M9.

On June 30 I published an extended essay called "Soup To Nuts" which looks at workflow, editing, gorillas and more.

On June 16 I published a "First Impressions" review of the Leica 35/1.4 ASPH (New Version) 

On May 27 I published a review of the Black Label Image Smith II camera bag.

On May 25 I published an extensive review of six medium-fast 35 mm rangefinder lenses on the Leica M9.

On April 21 I published an extensive review of the Ricoh GXR with A12 module.

On March 24 I published an extensive review of the Canon 17/4.0 L TS-E Tilt/Shift lens.

On March 11 I published a new essay called "Seeing The Subject".

On March 8 I published an extensive review of the Canon 24/3.5 L TS-E II Tilt/Shift lens.

On February 26 I published a full review of the Canon 85/1.2 L II.

On January 22 I published a full review of the Leica S2.

Published  December 15: In late November of this year,  I had the opportunity to do some controlled side by side
testing of the Leica X1, Panasonic GF1 and Sigma DP2.  I've now been able to process and prepare those test
pictures for new article sections that look at how the three cameras compare at ISO 100 - 3200. Variations on
that testing and text can now be found in detailed updates to my reviews of all three cameras.


On November 27 I added a small set of pictures to my review of the X1 that were all made using auto-focus. All were
made 
at ISO 1600 and most were made with the camera's lens wide open.

On November 25 I published an essay on Zone Focusing.

On November 20 I published the first part of my "Rolling Review" of the Panasonic GF1.

On November 17 I added a new section to my review of the Leica X1 that looks, generally, at  auto-focus speed
in cameras that use medium sized sensors.

On November 14 I revised the "Shutter Lag" section of my X1 review based on new tests done with firmware 1.00.

On November 13 I added some illustrations made at ISO 1600 and 3200 to my "rolling review" of the Leica X1.
Michael Reichman at Luminous-Landscape also has published his review of the X1 and I recommend reading
it as well.

On October 30 I published my review of the Ricoh GR III.

On October 29 I further expanded my review of the Canon 5D Mk II with a test of its weather sealing.

Coming Up:

- Fast 35 mm lenses on the Leica M9 (including the new version of the Leica 35/1.4 Summilux)


"I have to say that I am in awe of your thoughtfulness and intelligence as they're reflected in what you've done. I'm sorry I hadn't come across your work before."

- Tod Papageorge
Photographer
Director Of Graduate Studies In Photography
Yale University School Of Art


"In the din of the Internet's noise, Sean Reid is one of a handful of voices worth listening to."

- Kent Phelan
Photographer

"The best and most detailed account (of the Leica M8) I've yet read from a photographer's point of view is on the Reid Reviews site."

- Peter Marshall
Photography Guide, About.com


"Reviewing photographic equipment isn't as easy as it looks. Not only does it take writing skill, and a critical sensibility, but for the review to carry weight and have value its author must have significant experience with similar and previous equipment.  Sean Reid has written equipment reviews for The Luminous Landscape for the past two years, and unfailingly they have been well-researched and comprehensive.  Sean writes with both style and insight, and bases his opinions on his years as a photographer, and not simply from the perspective of a technologist, as is too frequently found on the Net.  His site is free of advertising, and well worth your support. I was particularly taken by his article "On Small Sensor Cameras". It is a unique perspective on how different digital formats are redrawing the face of photography."

- Michael Reichmann, Publisher
The Luminous Landscape


Welcome to ReidReviews.com, an on-line magazine of reviews and essays by photographer and writer Sean Reid.  Each year, there will be at least twelve new articles about the tools and practice of photography added to this site.  

Every writer naturally brings his or her own experience and perspective to the articles he or she writes.  My writing is heavily influenced by my experience working as a professional commercial and documentary photographer for the past twenty-five years.  I'm primarily interested in cameras and lenses as tools for drawing, as I believe that photography really is a branch of drawing.  I'm guided by the photographer Andre Kertesz's observation, "I see the thing, I feel the thing, I make the thing".  So when I review a camera or a lens, I look primarily at how it presents the world to the photographer (via the finder), how it works as a tool in the hands, and how it draws the kind of picture we call a photograph.

 


 

There are at least two kinds of review content on this web site.  There are reviews of cameras and lenses that are receiving wide attention from many photographers and reviewers as well as reviews of equipment that is of great interest to more specialized groups of photographers.  For example, I have written quite a bit about the Epson R-D1 and lenses for digital rangefinder photography and rangefinder equipment will continue to be an important focus in my writing.  Naturally, this will include further articles about the Leica M8 and various lenses on that camera.  I'm also an architectural and documentary wedding photographer and so will be looking at the performance of cameras and lenses in those contexts.  I obviously can't write about every piece of photographic equipment and so my focus is really on tools that, I think, deserve some attention from serious photographers, professional or amateur.  Sometimes they are fairly new to the market, other times they might be quite old and found only as used equipment.  In either case, if I decide to write about a lens or camera, it's because I believe it's worth reading about. I was a film photographer for two decades (and a B&W exhibition printer for a few years) but I now work entirely with digital capture. As such, most of my camera reviews will be of digital models. That said, I do also review film cameras from time to time.  The individual reviews obviously discuss specific cameras and/or lenses but all of the reviews also look at more general aspects of photography that can be relevant no matter what camera and/or lens a photographer uses. 

Portfolios of some of the work I do for clients can be found on my photography web site.

 

"Quite simply, I think your sections on 'drawing' and and on 'sunny day lenses' are the best writing about photographic lenses that I have read - whether in magazines, journals, books or the various sources online. Few professional writers about photography ever attempt such a full consideration of the range of lens performance characteristics and the different ways in which they are photographically significant. Some discussions in photographic communities online circle around the subject, but don't achieve the focus, rigour and articulacy that you have managed here. Your article is what all writing about photographic lenses ought to be like, yet it's astonishing that next to none of it is. Interesting though Irwin Puts Leica lens book is, it would have been so much more interesting, and so much more appropriate to its subject matter, if it had been written as you have written here...I found the article incredibly useful and interesting. A great help in clarifying and firming up what I have experienced and half-understood about how different lenses work."

- Simon Pulman-Jones, England

"We all owe you a vote of thanks for such a massive and thorough piece of work. What a concept-- a "lens test" that is really about the pictorial effect of how lenses draw their images. Lines per millimeter and MTF graphs have their place, but your article really gets to the heart of the matter in the way that photographers can relate to instantly."

- Peter Klein, USA


"This is a really excellent in depth review. I particularly like how you guide the reader not to look for winners, but to use it as a reference for their own needs. I think it may turn out to be a reference classic for working photographers seeking how to judge lenses in real world use.. I for one will be returning to it."

- Jim Watts, USA


"I read your substantial paper with great interest. I am an amateur enthusiast in photography and optics. Your concept first surprised me, because I have had an impression that few photographers in North America and possibly in Europe like to discuss lens characters as expression tools. Among Japanese photographers, amateurs and professionals alike, there is a long tradition of interest or even addiction in appreciating various image characters of optics. For instance, Shoji Ohtake, one of the most influential photographers in Japan writes a regular column titled Lens Physiognomy for a major camera journal. He says that for each of his representation he selects the right lens from his huge collection.  I was impressed by your pragmatic and well-organised approach in reviewing the lenses. Your observation is keen and relevant to essential aspects of photographic imagery. Your rhetoric is straight, logical, and free from jargon. These are rarely met in review papers on similar tests, which tend to be too technical or too subjective. I should also tell you that I myself have evaluated lenses mostly in B&W for the same reason as in your reviews. Few people have understood me. All in all, it is a marvelous paper. My applause."

- Mikiro Mori, Japan

"...a very informative, even enlightening, work. It not only provides visual evidence of comparative lenses' performance, it also gets right to the most important factor of lens evaluation - how the image looks to the photographer. Long ago I stopped reading test charts of lenses since none of my clients ever published any. It is always the look of the finished image that counts."

- Richard Weisgrau, USA

"I hope your tests become a benchmark for other reviewers to pay more attention to the real needs of photographers..."

- Phil Fogle, USA


"I think that your approach is what photographers have been asking for. Your article was spectacularly successful. I didn't think a review could be any better than yours on wide angles for the R-D1, but you topped it with this one. Thank you for all the hard work that went into it!"

- Bill Marshall, USA

 

 



 

ReidReviews.com accepts no advertising.  A subscription is currently $32.95 per year. To get an idea of whether or not my writing will be useful to you, I'd recommend reading some of my existing reviews on Luminous-Landscape which are linked in the pictures below or my review of the Canon 5D which was published on Imaging Resource.  Together, they can provide you with a good sense of how I approach reviewing photographic tools. 

 


Wondering what other photographers have thought of Reid Reviews?  Take a look at some reviews of the site at About.comShards of Photography, Rangefinder ForumImaging Resource and Photographica.


A list of current articles on Reid Reviews can be found at the site's table of contents.
 



The one-year subscription rate for the site is $32.95.  Once your username and password have been issued, the subscription amount is not refundable.  The best way to sample my reviews (to decide if you'd want to be a subscriber) is to read my freely available Luminous-Landscape and Imaging Resource reviews linked above.  Pay Pal customers can pay for their subscriptions using their Pay Pal accounts and people who are not Pay Pal customers may make a one-time credit card payment to Reid Reviews via PayPal.  To make a payment by check please follow the instructions listed on the "subscribe" page which is linked below.


Important:
 Reid Reviews' normal business hours are 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST Monday through Friday (excluding holidays) and any problems with subscriptions, responses to e-mail, etc. are normally handled during those business hours. I am, however, sometimes away for medical appointments during those hours and appreciate your patience if you need to wait for a response to your e-mail.  If subscribing, please be sure that the full name you provide exactly matches the name on your PayPal account.

Please Note: I will be travelling for work, with only periodic access to e-mail,  from July 28 - August 9.  If you need to
contact me during that time period, please allow extra time for my reply.



*Important*: Before Subscribing, Please Note the Following:

The subscriber section of ReidReviews.com requires Macromedia's Flash player (version 7 or later), which you may already have installed on your computer.  If not, you can download it for free hereWe recommend using the newest version of Flash that is available for your computer and, for some browsers, using the newest available version of Flash may be required. Since the subscriber section of the site is written in Flash, the content is set at a fixed size and one needs a monitor resolution setting of at least 1152 x 864 pixels to see the full site (at full screen setting) without needing to scroll horizontally. To preview the size and design of the site please click here.

Again, please remember that the site appears at a fixed size (in pixels) on any monitor.
* We have optimized the size of the site's active window based on feedback from many subscribers, most of whom are working with higher resolution displays. For ease of reading, however, there are ways to zoom the Reid Reviews Flash window (and text sizes) to different sizes. See the tips at the end of this section for suggestions.

The active content of the site appears in a Flash window that can be vertically scrolled using the traditional on-screen graphics as well as the up/down arrow keys or mouse scroll wheel. For security reasons, the site content cannot be copied or printed. None of the material published on Reid Reviews may be reproduced in any form without permission from the author.

This site is best viewed on a calibrated monitor. My own calibrations are based on a gamma of 2.2, for both my Windows and Macintosh computers, and monitors calibrated to other gamma levels will display these pictures in ways that aren't quite as intended. Please keep that in mind, as you read the articles, if you are calibrated to a gamma other than 2.2. My own editing monitor is an NEC 2490 Spectra View which I calibrate regularly.

Reid Reviews is a high-bandwidth site full of high quality JPEGs that, intentionally, are saved with minimal compression.  In addition to having a monitor resolution of at least 1152 x 864 pixels, I also strongly recommend that readers use a high speed Internet connection for browsing the site. It's possible to browse Reid Reviews using a low speed connection but doing so will require a great deal of patience. Preserving the thoroughness and technical picture quality of the reviews requires that the included JPEGs be only lightly compressed. The RR article pages may load more slowly than a typical web page but the technical quality of the JPEGs on those RR pages will also be much higher than is normal on the web.

When you choose your user name and password *please* record them in a safe place for future reference. If you misplace your user name or password please click on the "Log In" link and follow the instructions there.

Paypal should automatically confirm your payment so that your subscription begins immediately. Due to the mysteries of PayPal, however, this sometimes does not happen for a small percentage of new subscriptions.  The most common reason for Paypal subscription problems is entering a subscription account name that does not exactly match the name one provides to PayPal.  If you've made a subscription payment but do not yet have access to the site, please allow up to 48 hours (Monday - Friday) for me to manually confirm your subscription. Sometimes this confirmation will happen in minutes if your payment is made during business hours (9 - 5 EST) Monday through Friday.  I am a working photographer, however, so I'm not always at the computer and your patience is appreciated. That said,  I do my best to get accounts activated as quickly as possible.  

When you subscribe, please enter your name exactly as it appears on your PayPal account (if you have one).  Doing so can help to prevent problems with a subscription starting automatically. Name mismatches are the primary reason new subscriptions do not activate automatically.

If you have questions, please e-mail me.  

Our Policy On Advertising

Reid Reviews believes in the significant value of clearly separating reviewing and advertising. The site has not ever accepted - does not and will not accept - advertising. Our content is supported by readers alone. It is a simple exchange - the people who read the content pay for its creation. Advertisers pay for much of the content one reads on the web and in print. Reid Reviews, by very conscious choice, does not work that way.

As many readers know, RR is an independent site in many senses of that word. We hope that our readers can appreciate the value of this approach. As a society, we are barraged with advertising everywhere it seems (on the web, on televison, on radio, on buses, streets, etc.). Reading Reid Reviews is, we hope, an oasis from that.

The purpose of advertising, ultimately, is to convince us that we need to buy whatever product a manufacturer wants to sell us. Advertising in photography has long perpetuated the myth that owning certain brands and certain products will magically make one a better photographer. But we all know, of course, how false that myth is.

Apple iPhones, iPads, etc.

Apple, unfortunately, has not yet chosen to support Flash with portable devices like the iPad. This means that owners of these devices are unable to use them to access millions of Flash web sites, including Reid Reviews. My business and family own many Apple products and are quite happy with them. In fact, the Mac Pro is reviewed on this site and I continue to recommend it to serious photographers. But we hope that Apple decides to add Flash support to the Ipad in the future. 

Reid Reviews will remain a Flash site and will not be changing format in order to compensate for Apple's choice to not support Flash on the Ipad. Flash allows the site to maintain a degree of content security without requiring subscribers to install security keys on their computers. Setting aside the question of Flash support, moreover, many of the articles on the site are best viewed on a well-calibrated monitor - especially the technical reviews.

For an interesting take on this issue, see Adobe's comments here. Apple is an innovative company but they should not be trying to dictate how content is delivered on the web. That would be the tail wagging the dog. Apple should, in our opinion, be developing devices that support the various content delivery systems on the web - not vice versa. 

Imagine, by analogy, that Apple decided that Aperture would no longer read DNG files. Would we then expect camera manufacturers to abandon DNG and move to a newer RAW format that Apple embraced? And if Apple later decided to not support that newer format would we then expect camera manufacturers to switch again? Wouldn't it be more likely that photographers would instead switch from Aperture to software that supported the RAW formats they wanted to work with?

By extension then, I think that people looking to buy a computer tablet might consider choosing one that supports the kinds of content they want to read. Photographers who are frustrated that the Ipad does not support Flash (and thus does not allow them to read sites like Reid Reviews) may want to remember that the Ipad is not the only device of its kind on the market. Potential purchasers of the Ipad may want to learn more about - for example - a competing device called the WePad which reportedly does support Flash. The Wepad also reportedly features a larger, higher resolution screen than the Ipad as well as having additional functionality.

Flash is an important part of the web and a truly versatile web device should support it. Apple owners who feel likewise may want to contact Apple and let them know that real Flash support (not an application-based quasi-workaround) is important to customers and potential customers.

Reid Reviews, by the way, is created using Macintosh computers.

Ad Blocking Software

Some Ad-blocking software (such as "AdMuncher" for Windows)  can reportedly interfere with the functioning of Flash based sites such as Reid Reviews. Of course, Reid Reviews has no advertising (pop-up or otherwise) but at least one reader has reported that "Admuncher" was blocking the articles on this site. The solution, reportedly, is to make reidreviews.com an exception in the ad-blocking software.

A Possible Bug In Macintosh Snow Leopard

Readers who upgrade to Snow Leopard may find that they need to reinstall some of their system fonts. If you log into Reid Reviews and can see pictures but no text, be sure to reinstall Arial fonts. Some Mac OS upgrades can be especially temperamental about this. One reader noted that he needed to use "Font Book" to move the Arial fonts from  the "user " to the "computer" area. Why do some Macs lose certain fonts with an OS upgrade? I wish we could tell you. Obviously, they shouldn't be.


A Side Note on Macintosh Computers and Text Readability 

I work primarily with Macintosh computers but also periodically check the site functionality on Windows machines.

Macintosh OSX, and later Macintosh operating systems, anti-alias fonts in such a way that some (such as myself) find it more difficult to read text. Without any special smoothing, the text on the Reid Reviews site should look like this. For a further discussion of this issue and some proposed solutions, see this article.  In particular, Mac owners who find it hard to read the smoothed fonts created by OS-X might want to try downloading the free Tinkertool and using it to disable font smoothing up to, say, 18 points. This change can make most Mac text much more readable to those of us for whom smoothing causes eyestrain, etc. That true not only for this site but also for thousands of other sites on the web.

The articles on Reid Reviews are displayed using Arial as the font. It's a Sans Serif font that some argue is less readable in print, than a Serif font would be, but more readable on screen. Opinions vary widely on this topic and several of the studies cited to support the use of Serif fonts have been heavily challenged and criticized. Readers who are interested in this topic might find this article, for example, to be of interest.  

It is important that one have the Arial fonts installed, on his or her computer, to view the site correctly. If those fonts aren't installed, one may observe various layout problems in the articles on the site.


Zooming Reid Reviews With Macintosh OS-X Or Windows Using the Firefox Web Browser

Firefox Version 3.04 (presumably also later versions and possibly also slightly older versions) allows one to zoom the size of the Reid Reviews active window in or out as desired. Firefox can be downloaded here


Zooming Reid Reviews With Macintosh OSX

Subscribers who use Macintosh OS-X computers, and who are working at screen resolutions greater than 1152 x 864 pixels, may want experiment with using the "zoom" feature in OS-X which allows one to, in effect, enlarge the Reid Reviews Flash window so that it fills as much of the monitor's area as desired. The site content can then be scrolled using the usual up/down page keys. For further information about this feature see this article.  I'd like to thank RR subscriber Aurin Raeder for this excellent tip. 

Zooming Reid Reviews With Windows

Subscribers who use Windows and would like to change the size of the active Flash window in Reid Reviews can do so using Internet Explorer 7 or Avant Browser

Renew or check how long you have left on your subscription

 

Other resources:

Luminous-Landscape

Open Photography Forums

Leica Homepage On Facebook
tedirectly on the forum site.