Current subscribers can click on the header above to log in, if
desired. The link to renew a subscription
or to check when it expires is near the bottom of this page.
The Reid Reviews article index gives a listing of stories published to date.
For suggestions about how to get the most out of the site see our site tips.
normal business hours are 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST Monday through
(excluding holidays) and any problems with subscriptions, responses to e-mail, etc. are normally handled
during those business hours. I am, however, sometimes away photographing during those hours and
appreciate your patience if you need to wait for a response to your e-mail. If subscribing, please be sure that the
full name you provide exactly matches the name on your PayPal account.
On February 26 I published Into the Shadows: Leica M10 Monochrom which that looks at that camera's
shadow recovery noise levels at ISO 160 and ISO 320.
On February 10 I published an article that looks at the highlight headroom and estimated native ISO of
the Leica M10 Monochrom and M Monochrom (Typ 246). This article might also be interesting to
photographers who are hoping to see other monochrome camera models reach the market in the future.
On February 5 I published side by side lens tests of the Fuji X100F and a late pre-production Fuji X100V
running firmware 1.oo.
On February 4 I published side by side studio tests of the Fuji X100F and a late pre-production Fuji X100V
running firmware 1.oo.
On February 4 I published an in-depth review of a late pre-production Fuji X100V running firmware 1.oo.
On January 18 I published an article which looks at side by side studio resolution tests of the M10 Monochrom
and the M Monochrom (Typ 246) with two challenging rangefinder lenses and side by side studio vignetting
tests of those two cameras with four rangefinder lenses.
On January 17, 2020 I published a review of the Leica M10 Monochrom and an article which looks at
side by side studio tests of the M10 Monochrom and the M Monochrom (Typ 246).
On December 18 I published a very detailed review of the Fujifilm X-Pro 3.
On December 3 I published my review of the Panasonic S1R.
On November 22 I published the results of studio and field tests of the Sigma 45/2.8 DG DN on the Leica SL2.
For simplicity, these test results have been added (as new pages) to my earlier review of the Sigma 45.
On November 14 I published a studio comparison test of the Leica M 28/2.8 ASPH (Pre-2016) lens on the
Leica SL2, Leica SL, Leica M (Typ 240) and Panasonic S1R.
On November 10 my Leica SL2 Field Report was expanded with a table that shows approximate auto-focus
speeds for seven L mount lenses tested on the SL2, SL and Panasonic S1R.
On November 10 I published side-by-side studio tests of the Leica SL, SL2 and Panasonic S1R. These look at
converted raw file quality, color rendering, noise levels at various ISO settings and color moire.
On November 6 I published the first of several articles I will be writing about the Leica SL2. This first story
looks at my impressions of the camera having worked with it in the field this fall.
On October 28 I published a full review of the Fujinon GF 63/2.8 R lens based on studio and field tests.
On October 7 I published a full review of the Sigma 45/2.8 DG DN lens tested on the Leica SL and
On September 7 I published a field test of four compact wide-angle rangefinder lenses on the Fuji X-T3.
On August 30 I published a studio test article that looks at the highlight headroom and native ISO of
the Leica Q2 and Q.
On August 22 I published a full review of the Fujinon GF 23/4.0 WR lens based on studio and field tests.
On July 25 I published a test of two compact 28 mm rangefinder lenses on the Nikon Z7.
On July 19 I revised and expanded my review of the Nikon Z7.
On July 16 I
published an extensive review of the Nikon Z7. This is our site's 500th article. Coming up will
be tests of various rangefinder and manual focus Nikon lenses on the Z7. I will also be doing formal studio tests
looking at the ways the Z7 renders color and performs at various ISO levels.
On July 3 I published the results of studio tests done to compare the color rendering and file quality
(at various ISO levels) of the Ricoh GR III and GR II.
On June 28 I
published an extensive review of the Hasselblad XCD 45/3.5 lens based on studio and field tests.
On June 19 I published the results of full studio tests done comparing the performance of the lenses used in
the Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR III.
On June 12 I added new pages to my Ricoh GR III review based on working with the camera at Laconia
On June 7 I
published an extensive review of the Ricoh GR III. Coming up will be articles based on studio tests
comparing the GR III to the Ricoh GR II.
On May 16 I published a short review of the Sony A9 used with a Leica 28/2.8 Elmarit Aspherical.
review of and guide to using Adobe Lightroom's new integrated Flat
Field tool for
correcting color drift and luminance vignetting. This piece is part of a small group of articles which are available
to read without a subscription.
published an extensive review of the Pentax
HD DA 15/4.0 Limited
lens based on studio and field tests
done using the Pentax KP.
published an extensive review of the Fujinon XF 16/2.8 WR lens based
on studio and field tests
done using the Fuji X-Pro 2. This article also looks at the very interesting affects software distortion correction
can have on color fringing.
published a full review of the Pentax KP based on extensive field
testing and studio testing.
Between March 8 - 11 I have published several updates to my review of the Leica Q2.
published a 14 page review of the Leica 28/1.7 Summilux ASPH fixed
lens on the Leica
Q and Q2 including full studio tests. That article also covers a lot of ground and includes many example
pictures made with the Q2’s lens wide open at F/1.7. A third article based on working with the Q2 at
Daytona Bike Week and Daytona Beach is in the works.
published a very detailed review of the Leica Q2 based on extensive
field testing in many
locations as well as controlled studio tests comparing the new model to the Leica Q.
On February 22 I published a review of five small format rangefinder lenses tested on the Fuji GFX 50R.
This article, which includes over 130 illustrations, looks not only at these camera/lens pairings but also at the
larger question of mixing lenses and cameras of different formats. What are the possibilities here for medium
format square pictures? What happens if we decide to intentionally embrace the semi-circle created by this
hard vignetting as well as the off-axis resolution losses (which function in ways that can be related to depth
of field)? This is a test article but also one that looks at some larger questions about photography itself and,
in particular, the ways in which we think about the frame.
published an extensive review of the Cosina Voigtlander 50/1.2 M
Nokton Aspherical based on
field and studio tests including side by side comparison testing with the Voigtlander 50/1.1 M Nokton. This
review includes over 70 illustrations.
On January 22 I updated my review of the Sony A7R III.
On January 15, 2019 I published a full review of the Fuji GFX 50R.
writer naturally brings his or her
own experience and perspective to the articles he or she
writes. My writing is heavily influenced by my
working as a professional photographer for more than
years. I'm primarily interested in cameras and
tools for drawing, as I believe that photography really is a
drawing. As the photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson once
an interview, "My
just an instant drawing...I never quit drawing. The camera
is a way of
I'm also guided by the photographer Andre Kertesz's observation, "I see the thing, I feel the thing, I make the thing". So when I review a camera or a lens, I look primarily at how it presents the world to the photographer (via the finder), how it works as a tool in the hands, and how it draws the kind of picture we call a photograph.
"Quite simply, I think your sections on 'drawing' and and on 'sunny day lenses' are the best writing about photographic lenses that I have read - whether in magazines, journals, books or the various sources online. Few professional writers about photography ever attempt such a full consideration of the range of lens performance characteristics and the different ways in which they are photographically significant. Some discussions in photographic communities online circle around the subject, but don't achieve the focus, rigour and articulacy that you have managed here. Your article is what all writing about photographic lenses ought to be like, yet it's astonishing that next to none of it is. Interesting though Irwin Puts Leica lens book is, it would have been so much more interesting, and so much more appropriate to its subject matter, if it had been written as you have written here...I found the article incredibly useful and interesting. A great help in clarifying and firming up what I have experienced and half-understood about how different lenses work."
"We all owe you a vote of thanks for such a massive and thorough piece of work. What a concept-- a "lens test" that is really about the pictorial effect of how lenses draw their images. Lines per millimeter and MTF graphs have their place, but your article really gets to the heart of the matter in the way that photographers can relate to instantly."
- Peter Klein, USA
- Jim Watts, USA
Mikiro Mori, Japan
"...a very informative, even enlightening, work. It not only provides visual evidence of comparative lenses' performance, it also gets right to the most important factor of lens evaluation - how the image looks to the photographer. Long ago I stopped reading test charts of lenses since none of my clients ever published any. It is always the look of the finished image that counts."
Richard Weisgrau, USA
"I hope your tests become a benchmark for other reviewers to pay more attention to the real needs of photographers..."
- Phil Fogle, USA
- Bill Marshall, USA
ReidReviews.com accepts no advertising. A subscription is currently $39.95 per year. To get a sense of my writing style and approach you may want to read any of the freely accessible articles linked in the Read Without A Subscription section of our article index. And, of course, that index includes every article on RR so you'll be able to see just what content can be found here. As of late November, 2017 there were over 450 articles on the site, most of them quite extensive. All of them are reviews or essays.
list of current articles on Reid
Reviews can be found at the site's article
readers know, RR has always been an independent site in many
that word. We hope that our readers can appreciate the value
approach. As a society, we are barraged with advertising (on
on televison, on radio, on buses, streets, etc.). Reading Reid
is, we hope, an oasis from that. We have never accepted
we never will. We also have never taken sales commission from
business. The Reid Reviews system is simple: we create the
our readers, and only our readers, pay for it.
For a humorous, but also very perceptive, take on where the line between journalism and advertising seems to be heading, for some publications at least, see this John Oliver video. I highly recommend watching it.
Article Viewer Options
The new site offers six ways to view Reid Reviews content. Click the image below to read about these.
either image below to get a sense of what our main HTML 5
like on a 1920 by 1200 pixel monitor. Our mobile viewers are
and more compact. The grey dots you see on each page are
open or close the side panels (an article list panel on the
left and a
search panel on the right).
Useful tips on using the Reid Reviews site can be found here. That page is worth reading and will be updated from time to time.
The one-year subscription rate for the site is $39.95. Once your username and password have been issued, the subscription amount is not refundable. The best way to sample my work (to decide if you'd want to be a subscriber) is to read the freely accessible articles linked in the Read Without A Subscription section of our article index. Pay Pal customers can pay for their subscriptions using their Pay Pal accounts and people who are not Pay Pal customers may make a one-time credit card payment to Reid Reviews via PayPal. To make a payment by check please follow the instructions listed on the "subscribe" page which is linked below.
normal business hours are 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST Monday
Friday (excluding holidays) and any problems with
responses to e-mail, etc. are normally handled during those
hours. I am, however, sometimes away for medical appointments
those hours and appreciate your patience if you need to wait
response to your e-mail. If subscribing,
please be sure that the full name you
provide exactly matches the name on your PayPal account.
don't match there's a good chance the system will not be able
your subscription automatically.
Reid Reviews is a high-bandwidth site full of high quality JPEGs that, intentionally, are saved with minimal compression so each picture file is quite large (given its dimensions). Preserving the thoroughness and technical picture quality of the reviews requires that the included JPEGs be only lightly compressed.
When you choose your user name and password *please* record them in a safe place for future reference. If you misplace your user name or password please click on the "Log In" link and follow the instructions there.
should automatically confirm your
payment so that your subscription begins immediately. Due to
mysteries of PayPal, however, this sometimes does not happen
small percentage of new subscriptions. The most common
Paypal subscription problems is entering a subscription
that does not exactly match the name one provides to
you've made a subscription payment but do not yet have
access to the
site, please contact us to manually confirm your
subscription. I am
a working photographer, however, so I'm not always at the
your patience is appreciated. That said, I do my best to
accounts activated as quickly as possible once I know that
activation is needed.
When you subscribe, please enter your name exactly as it appears on your PayPal account (if you have one) or credit card (if paying without a Paypal account). Doing so can help to prevent problems with a subscription starting automatically. Name mismatches are the primary reason new subscriptions do not activate automatically.
Again, if the name you enter for your subscription does not match the name on your PayPal account (or credit card) there's a very good chance that your subscription won't start automatically.If you have questions, please e-mail me.
Log-In (Remember, you can also always log in by clicking the header at the top of this page).
Renew or check how long you have left on your subscription